¿Ideology, flag or what?
Communism should be seriously studied by all those who struggle vainly to implement it. There will be convinced, if they are honest with yourself, which will inexorably before her eyes.
It should be studied carefully by those who oppose him, especially for the great majority that has stigmatized the word communism. I am convinced that the latter, unintentionally, are major contributors to self-identified communists arise. If you are studying, who you do, know the basic tools and specialized to prevent the occurrence, tactics, propaganda, resources and laws of communism.
If you want to contact a communist with some experience in the implementation of that system, do not look for will not find it, there is not. One can imagine or say that the greatest benchmark of that struggle on the planet was Fidel. Even the sun today nobody has referred, beyond this austere Venezuelan amanuensis, to words that he said his chance for a television channel and that anyone with common sense, had to show his acceptance of failure. All his behavior in recent years test this claim. Moreover, the insurmountable contradictions of the Cuban revolution, are a final judgment. And as if all this were not enough, the man lived 60 years trying something and nothing. A Chamo today had told him, of being able: Hey you, Horse, Pale when we are going to leave her? I notice that I use the word "failure" for convenience of language, but then go back on it.
In another area, I express the following: If you deliberately take five, maybe ten points which define communism as maximum, you will see that they are quite good, many ideologies also touting. So why do they fail ?, is the question of rigor.
Comentarios